This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’ve published several articles and presented poster sessions at national conventions. I knew how the pharmacists and the techs scurried around the prescription department. They typed labels, talked to doctors and patients, and focused on the daily number of prescriptionsfilled. So I majored in pharmacy.
Ingredient and product quality assurance The potential for variation in medical product manufacturing, distribution and regulatory capability across regions and economies can present challenges to ensuring quality and pose threats to patient safety and public health. As a standards-setting organization, USP is uniquely positioned to help.
Manufacturer-Focused Input Question 30: Off-Label Use. CMS has appropriately highlighted the significance of off- label use information, providing a specific avenue for manufacturers to submit data on off-label uses supported by evidence-based guidelines listed in CMS-recognized Part D compendia. Question 36: Dossier Submission.
However, the scope and complexity of the proposed rule may present implementation challenges. 3 ,4, 5 As such, the NHC supports CMS proposal to ensure that Part D sponsors cover AOMs for obesity with clinical criteria that is not more restrictive than the FDA labeling for each AOM. 14 National Health Council.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 11,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content