This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Perhaps unsurprisingly given the extraordinary focus on drugpricing in the last decade, generic competition—FDA’s only real way to have an effect on drugpricing—tops this year’s list. In the second category—limiting blockades to marketing—are efforts to limit blocking exclusivities and induced infringement liability.
Overall, while the NHC appreciates CMS’ intent to streamline the data submission process and make it more accessible, we encourage ongoing dialogue and adjustments to ensure that the process remains patient-centered, efficient, and capable of capturing the full spectrum of information necessary to inform meaningful drugprice negotiations.
Kirschenbaum — On May 24, Minnesota enacted the Commerce and Consumer Protection Omnibus Bill, Senate File 2744 ( SF 2744 ), which significantly expands the state’s existing drugpricing activities with serious implications for all drug manufacturers, and particularly generic drug manufacturers.
General Comments The NHC appreciates CMS’ commitment to actively engaging with stakeholders, including patients, consumer advocates, and health experts, in implementing the Medicare DrugPrice Negotiation Program (DPNP). It is crucial to consider how off-label uses will be evaluated and incorporated into the negotiation process.
We’ve expressed our own strong opinions on the topic in several blog posts, including this one. To learn how two hospitals we serve do just that, Click Here to read our blog post, “How To Manage A Director of Pharmacy’s Responsibilities And An Optimized 340B Program. Without Hiring More Staff.”
We’ve expressed our own strong opinions on the topic in several blog posts, including this one. To learn how two hospitals we serve do just that, Click Here to read our blog post, “How To Manage A Director of Pharmacy’s Responsibilities And An Optimized 340B Program. Without Hiring More Staff.”
3 ,4, 5 As such, the NHC supports CMS proposal to ensure that Part D sponsors cover AOMs for obesity with clinical criteria that is not more restrictive than the FDA labeling for each AOM. Issue Brief: Improving Prescription DrugPrice and Cost Transparency. 2 (2024): 206 214, [link] www.jmcp.org/doi/epdf/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.206.
The manufacturer’s agreement must cover all its labeler codes that contain an applicable drug or a selected drug. All labeler codes that are covered by Discount Program agreements will be distributed to PDP sponsors and posted on the CMS website. of the total expenditures for all Part D drugs in 2021.
In response, ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly published a blog post sharing his concerns with the Administration’s proposal to permit widespread automatic (pharmacy-level) substitution of all biosimilars in place of their reference products; without physician approval or FDA evaluation as current law requires.
Absent from the statute is any requirement to report information on manufacturer costs and price setting. Nevertheless, riding on the wave of drugprice transparency legislation in several states and similar legislative proposals in Congress, CMS is proposing to expand the MDRP into the realm of drugprice transparency reporting.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 11,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content